Model of the Month: April 2009
Integrated Berkeley Comfort Model
The Berkeley Comfort Model provides localized comfort results for each body segment computed from temperatures predicted by our Human Comfort Module. The Berkeley Comfort Model was developed at University of California-Berkeley's Center for the Built Environment. It is an advanced design tool for assessment of thermal comfort designs and functions as a separately-licensed feature within our software. An overview of the Berkeley Comfort Model can be viewed here.
Air Conditioning Source Temperature Curves
This sample demonstrates an evaluation of AC pull-down using two different source air temperature profiles and the resulting effects on localized passenger comfort. The two profiles are shown in Figure 1 and more powerful AC system delivers colder airflow faster.
The human comfort manikin is seated in a rather fancy 4-door sedan in Arizona during the month of August. The air in the cabin is segmented into 3 air nodes, top, middle and bottom. The AC flow of 18,000 liter/minute is divided equally into these nodes and they are connected to surfaces of the cabin interior and the human model. We can see in Figure 2 the resulting temperatures for the cabin air nodes, dash board, and floor panel. The faster pull down of the higher-powered AC system is evident in the lowest set of air node curves. The thermal mass of the dash board, floor pan and other surfaces creates a slow downward trend that would continue past the 15-minute solution end time.
Higher Powered AC System Case: Thermal Sensation and Thermal Comfort
For the higher-powered, but less fuel-efficient, AC system, we can see in Figure 3 that our manikin undergoes very hot sensation for all body segments, followed by some segments being cooled below neutral comfort levels.
The intensity of the discomfort is visible in Figure 4, where overall comfort is restored (passing 0) at about T=5 minutes. Note that the Berkeley Comfort Model shows us that the head is very thermally sensitive, reaching a max 4.0 hot sensation quickly but then responding very quickly to the AC pull down and experiencing cold (below 0) sensation within 3 minutes.
Lower Powered AC System Case
For the lower-powered, more fuel efficient AC system, we recognize the longer period of hot thermal sensation and discomfort in Figures 5 and 6. The lower-powered AC system in this case results in a restoration of overall thermal comfort at about T=12 minutes. Note the local sensation of the head in Figure 5 shows the head crossing into the cool sensation region at T=5 minutes, two minutes longer than in the higher powered AC case (Figure 3).
Results: Comparison of High VS Low Powered AC Source
It can be argued that the second case, with energy savings through the reduced power load required by the AC, still provides a reasonable response to a hot startup under very hot conditions. The manikin achieves overall comfort in 12 minutes, rather than the 5 minutes delivered by the more consumptive but powerful AC system. The Berkeley Comfort Module thus demonstrates the value of decoupling the metrics of thermal comfort from thermal sensation and provides a means of optimizing the design of cooling on a body-segment level.
To learn how the ThermoAnalytics Human Comfort Module with the integrated Berkeley Comfort Model can be used to improve human effectiveness, comfort, and safety, contact us.
View More Sample Models
This sample model uses thermal design to improve the aircraft’s human comfort while reducing the power load on its climate control system.
This sample demonstrates an evaluation of AC pull-down using two different source air temperature profiles and the resulting effects on localized passenger comfort. The Berkeley Comfort Model provides localized comfort results for each body segment computed from temperatures predicted by our Human Comfort Module.
The analysis for this structure involved a prediction of solar loading as well as air circulation patterns throughout the structure. ThermoAnalytics used RadTherm software to determine the need for transmissive or non transmissive glass and predicted internal temperatures of the Cathedral on a sunny days at both half and maximum occupancy.
A prediction of transient thermal comfort for humans driving a car through the desert. It provides realistic, localized loading of the vehicle's air nodes.
A human thermal model demonstrates the effects of solar intensity and ambient temperature. They drink a cup of coffee as the Human Comfort Module simulates their thermal response to the environment.
RadTherm can predict Formula 1 racetrack surface temperatures. Simulations based on weather and track temperature can be a powerful ally in an event where a racer can win by mere seconds.
We simulated a coil-in-tube cross flow heat exchanger to demonstrate RadTherm's fluid stream and convection heat transfer modeling capabilities. The heat exchanger surfaces were created in Rhino3D and meshed with ANSA. The mesh was exported into RadTherm.
Air travel passengers are all too familiar with the thermal discomforts of summer travel. Our DC-10 model provides insight to thermal management techniques that could improve the experience.
RadTherm can model the thermal behavior of complex systems. In this case, a refrigerated truck transports cargo in a contolled environment. We simulate the vehicle's thermal behavior and the cargo system's thermal response.
One of the most frequent complaints about motorcycles is the engine's heat plume. The plume hits the rider when they're idling in traffic or after getting off the highway. This analysis simulates this heat plume and predicts the temperature increase that the rider will experience.
This sample model demonstrates RadTherm's unique environmental effects applied to architectural analysis. You can generate transient thermal results by combining CFD results with RadTherm.
Thermal simulation of a brake system. The brake model is loosely based on the front rotors of a 2005 Ford Mustang.
This model simulates simple thermostatic control of two heating systems. It represents a common heated plate system used to cure adhesives or control chemical reaction rates.
Modeling the forest canopy generates accurate temperatures or IR signatures of objects in such environments. Studying the canopy can find passive "cool zones" for urban park development. Through simulation, the ideal size and location of trees can be planned to provide improved thermal comfort.
We model the development process of a simple exhaust-shield component model using the supplemental TDFUtility program (supplied with all software from ThermoAnalytics). The TDFUtility is a set of utilities combined into a single executable. We demonstrate how it can improve mesh and model quality.
Sample unmanned ground vehicle signature analysis featuring a simple hybrid drive engine and exhaust system and sensor tower. The defense industry needs to consider the thermal (infrared) signature of its systems under various operating conditions and environments. MuSES performs a full thermal analysis followed by a radiance solution in specific IR wave bands corresponding to the sensor of interest.
The Human Comfort Module is available under a separate license to simulate the thermal response of a human body in an environment with significant thermal loads.